As usual, the past two weeks were packed with tennis action. Everyday at work, I will pull on my earphones to listen to the live radio on australianopen.com and after work, I will rush home to watch the evening games. :))
A year ago at the Australian Open, we witnessed Federer's disappointment, being pushed to the edge of the cliff by Nadal who was at his peak. A year later, things took the turn at the corner. Nadal is plagued with one of the most destructible and undesirable injury any sportsman can face, knee tendinitis - inflammation of the knee tendon - and his career is put at stake. However, Federer had a bad start to 2009 but ended it with achievements, glory, and joy. Bagging two Grand Slams back to back, Roland Garros his first and Wimbledon his sixth, and his wife giving birth to a pair of twin daughters, it is indeed triple bliss.
I am really glad that streak of luck was brought forward to 2010. He started the year by bagging the Australian Championships for the fourth time in his career, taking his Grand Slam tally to an amazing 16, 2 ahead of all-time champion Pete Sampras. And judging at his streak of luck and consistency during play, it doesn't seem like his streak is gonna bottom out any time soon. :))


He cruised through the Australian Open having only dropped two sets and his play was once again flawless, revealing the true champion that he is and always will be. I do not deny that Murray accumulated better statistics in the past two weeks. Having only dropped one set in the entire run-up to the finals to Cilic and beating Nadal two sets and eventually Nadal had to retire when the scoreline was 3-0 in favour of Murray were fantastic and signs of a champion emerging. However, he was still one class below the Mighty Federer.
Murray ran after every ball possible in the three sets, defended tirelessly, played a few superb backhands down the line, and even broke Federer's serve several times in the game but he just could not gain control of the match. Federer was the dominating in an apparent manner throughout the match. Vijay and Alan both commented that both players have a similar style of play, with the beautiful forehand crosscourt shots and backhand slices being timed to perfection. So, if there is anyone that can beat Federer, it has to be someone of his calibre or at least style of play. Nonetheless, I hold opposition views. Roger is the Master of his style of play and no one can challenge him hitherto. Nadal is unique because he is a counterpuncher and plays a completely different style of tennis from Federer. Nadal simply runs after every ball possible and his style of tennis requires him to work out every single organ, muscle, tissue, and cell of his body. This is also why injuries are knocking on his door at only 24. But I do not deny Nadal does have the qualities to be a true champion.
Murray has the burden of the expectations of the whole nation, the Great Britain on him, and also his own desire to win his first Grand Slam. However, lady luck is not shining on him, is she? Like what he said on stage, "I can cry like Roger (did in the 2009 Australian Open), it's a shame I can't play like him." I really wish that Murray can get his first Grand Slam title soon because he is one of the few young stars that I truly admire, not even Djokovic, Nadal, or Del Potro can hold a candle to him, to me. I wish him better luck in the next few Grand Slams (provided Federer decides to retire?)
But for now, let's all hail Federer for his achievements. He is still my favourite player of all times. To be able to move around the court with such ease, speed, agility, and gracefulness truly deserves my greatest respect and sincerest admiration. I do not care how others compare him with Nadal, like what they do between Ronaldo and Messi, and that until he beats Nadal in one Grand Slam final to finally settle their scores, he is still not exactly a champion of Roland Garros. Nadal was at his peak when he won the Roland Garros and Wimbledon titles back to back in 2008, and the Australian Open in 2009, where he beated Federer in all three of the Grand Slams Finals. He was this promising 23 year old kid who is crowned to achieve big things in his tennis career and life, to dominate on clay and eventually becoming the King of Clay at this young age. In contrary, Federer was facing some kind of psychological illness and was going through rock bottom of his career when everyone was questioning his ability to compete at the top level, beat Pete Sampras's Grand Slam record, and also be part of the elite team that won all 4 Grand Slams. So it isn't exactly fair to Federer. I would really love to see the two battling out at a Grand Slam again soon, probably the Roland Garros this year, and to see Federer beating Nadal hands down and shut the mouths of the nosey parkers and critics.


For me, he is the reason why I think tennis is such an elegant sport, why I watch tennis, why I enjoy tennis, why I love tennis, why I play tennis, and why I will never give up tennis.
"A crown for every achievement."
"An angel that kills."
"Having the precision of a surgeon."
And these labels will only continue to flow. :)
Fabulous Federer, King Federer, and now MIGHTY FEDERER! :))
He is King Federer, born to be a Champion.
WE LOVE FEDERER! :))
