Tribute to LKY #3: United as One People

When the news of the Lying in State ceremony was announced, I was thinking to myself if it was really necessary to have it opened to public for as long as 4 days. However, when I saw the procession from Sri Temasek to Parliament House on Wednesday morning, I knew we would be in for a long wait if we really wanted to be there to pay our respects.

So my family and I decided to go wait it out on Friday night. When we were there last night, never have I felt so overwhelmed by the events that took place. Singaporeans are known for being pragmatic and efficient. The queue last night started from City Hall Mrt Station and one had to go through a few underpasses to first get to Padang and then onwards to the Marina Floating Platform and finally round Boat Quay before reaching the security checkpoint before the Parliament House. After waiting for almost an hour outside of the Singapore Recreation Club, senior police officers and army personnel came over to make announcements to urge people to go home because there were way too many people and the Padang is absolutely packed. It can no longer take in any more people for safety reasons. I was expecting people to start leaving or stop joining the queue on the opposite side of the road but to my surprise, people stay rooted to their feet. The queue was hardly moving at all and even after 3.5 hours, we only moved a mere 100 metres. The crowd did not diminish but instead grew larger as we waited longer. Being realistic did not overrule people's emotions to want to be at the Parliament House to mourn for a great man. For a good 5 minutes, there was absolute silence along that stretch of road. Cars were stopped by the policemen before the junction, people kept silent and waited for further announcements. For the first time in my life, I witnessed how our nation had come to a standstill. It did not matter whether we were sleepy or tired, we just knew that we had to wait.

At around 1 a.m., people started distributing bread, water, h2o, apples, sandwiches, etc. At that point in time, I started to wonder what should be the decision - to leave or to stay? I think if I were on the opposite side of the queue, I would definitely turn back home. However, we were just at the entrance to the Padang and that "so near yet so far" feeling really was too ingrained. I started to discuss with one of my cousins my thoughts. The police had made repeated pleas for people to leave because young children were having a hard time staying amidst the crowd and for safety concerns, it would be better for some people to leave so that there will be more space for others. It takes courage for someone to give up at this juncture and say, "I will make way for others" and though I will not be able to pay my respects to Mr. Lee at the Parliament House, at least the others can. This brings me to Economics and the idea of the "Tragedy of the Commons" Vs "Invisible Hand". Adam Smith said that if everyone were to be rational and maximise their own self-utility, the outcomes to society will be the best. Yet, when everyone in this case persevered in order to gain their maximum utility - which is to pay their respects, why then would this result in a stalemate situation? Everyone was waiting for the person next to him or her to leave. Anyway, we decided to leave at around 2.30 a.m.

What warmed my heart a lot was how this entire saga had unfolded throughout the week. My cousin and I went back to queue just a few hours ago and along the entire journey, there were volunteers giving out all the necessary items - umbrellas and ponchos, bread, biscuits, h2o, jia jia liang cha, water, chrysanthemum, ribena, wet tissue, trash bags, etc. They did it with a smile plastered on their faces, constantly reminding us that we need to stay hydrated. The army officers were also stationed at various checkpoints to encourage us and tell us how far we were away from our destination. People spoke politely, without the usual frustrations of people who emphasise so much on efficiency and being realistic. The queue was long but it was not too chaotic overall. None of the jostling and pushing, just the occasional one or two desperate to move a step ahead. I felt that if everyone had lined up in rows of two, it would have been more comfortable for everyone. While queuing up for the security check, I noticed people were trying to cut corners to get into a queue that was non-existent so I decided to turn around and politely asked everyone not to attempt to cut corners because it will simply slow everyone down. I was not too hopeful of people listening to me but to my surprise, people indeed stopped attempting to cut the corners. Bravo, Singaporeans!

Over the last week, I am pretty sure the top search on all internet search engines was probably none other than Singapore's founding father, Mr. Lee Kuan Yew. I think we, Singaporeans, have indeed showed the world who we truly are.

All the talk about Singaporeans being the most emotionless, apathetic about politics, uncaring, kiasu, pragmatic have all been overthrown by our display of our unity in the last 4 days. I have never seen Singaporeans so united in my entire life, sticking it out with each other during this period of national mourning. When we remain silent about your criticisms, it does not mean that we do not have a view of things. We just choose to respond at the appropriate time and the time has come with the passing of a leader whom we have a love-and-hate relationship yet have so much respect for him and bear so many bittersweet memories of him in our hearts.

Westerners say that Singaporeans do not have freedom because we fear the PAP. It is just that everyone's opinion of freedom and definition of success differ. I agree with an article which argued about what freedom is like in Singapore:

- to be able to walk on the streets in the middle of the night without fear, especially for women
- to have our young children going to school without fear of being gunned down, etc.

I think I personally value the above more than freedom of speech. There is a Chinese saying, 祸从口出，which means that words spell trouble. Whatever you do in life and whatever decisions you make, there are bound to be people who will agree and disagree. Their judgments and opinions stem from their experiences and way of life. Someone might tell you to stand up for yourself while another might tell you to let live and let go. There is no right or wrong, just who and what kind of a person do you want to be.

People also measure success differently. Some of us measure success by wealth, fame and status and there they go, chasing after the numbers and economic outcomes. Some of us measure success by our relationships with others - friends, family, colleagues and social outcomes affect them. They want less money but more time. At the end of the day, is there one measure that is more superior than the other? No doubt Mr. LKY used his own measure of success - strong economic growth to ensure Singapore's sustainability and made that the mantra of Singapore's governance, but a nation's definition of success is and will always be set by its founding politicians, ain't it? Americans value freedom because they were a colony and their fight of independence was successful when the campaign was fight upon the basis of freedom for all. Likewise, Mr. LKY fought a successful campaign to help Singapore gain independence because that was what Singapore needed at that time. We need employment, housing, and stability during those turbulent times when the world was divided between communism and democracy. There are critics out there who talked about how he had forced his definition of success down Singaporeans' throats but I disagree. If he had forced it down our throats, he would not have won the election in 1959 and in 1963. He won because he delivered the needs of the electorate - jobs and houses.

One thing, amidst all these criticisms of him being autocratic, is that I would like to remind everyone that he empower you to make changes if you did not like his way of governance. If you think that Singapore lacks freedom, lacks options, lacks creativity, you can pack your bags and leave anytime. We are a highly connected air hub and you can always fly to another country to get inspirations. His bilingual policy enables you to travel to two of the most powerful economies in the world - U.S.A and China, free of barriers. We cannot all be the next USA or Japan or countries in Western Europe. We can have a democratic system but there will always be variations. The world is non-homogeneous and it should always be. God created mankind and made us to be different on purpose. You do know that animals and human beings are discouraged from breeding within their own family or among their own offsprings so that we will not have the same DNA and end up lacking the right immunity for different things. So if we are all meant to be different right from the start, why should we all work towards becoming the next USA or UK or France or blah blah blah.

Singapore does not have the creativity of the West but we have the discipline and rigour that they lack. People talk about Singaporeans not being creative and risk-taking and hence we do not have enough entrepreneurs. Any entity or project is successful because there are A FEW who wants to lead and MANY others who follow. If everyone wants to be a leader, who is going to do the dirty job? Let those who are risk-loving be the ones to lead and for those who value stability more, let them be the workers. In that way, the world can then function! At the end of the day, if you think something is not to your fancy, change yourself. Don't expect the world to change for you.

When I was blogging on Monday and Tuesday, my lil sis asked me, "Since when did you become so patriotic or a big fan of LKY?" I told her I love Singapore because she gave me everything that I own now. I like Mr. LKY and I truly respect him and Dr. Goh Keng Swee as well. There is this unspoken affection, not just because of what he did to turn Singapore into a homeland. They have such great minds and put them to such great use. I see these people, read about them and gain tons of inspiration from them. They propel me on whenever I want to say "FML" because I realise that actions ALWAYS speak louder than words. They give me strength in adversity and teach me not to be complacent even in good times.

However, I do not think that everyone has to agree with me and his fans. Those who are critical of him should still have the room to express their opinions. It is just that in this week of mourning, they should just let him enjoy the glory that he deserves. It is like how people cease fire during a war when something tragic happens to either party. Unless you are going to be dead tomorrow and today is the last chance that you have to chide him, just give this dead man a break. You still have the rest of your lives to express your opinions.

Before I sign off, I just want to sum up all that I have written with this - Despite all the claims about his one-size-fits-all approach to governing, what is important is "we live with dignity under his rule", and isn't dignity the most basic and also the most important need of every human being universally? If you are willing to work in Singapore, you never have to beg. If you are truly in need, the government will never leave you in the lurch. If you are able to give, don't hold back.

R.I.P. Mr. Lee Kuan Yew. 1923 - 2015.

Tribute to LKY #2: My favourite LKY story

This article is my favourite piece out of the hundreds posted. It sums up everything about this man - life, work, family and love.

Source: ChannelNewsAsia

Mr Lee Kuan Yew's Red Box

SINGAPORE: The red box - a briefcase which held what the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew was working on at any time - was testament to his commitment to Singapore, wrote Education Minister Heng Swee Keat on Tuesday (Mar 24).

“When he noticed something wrong, like an ailing raintree, a note in the red box would follow,” said Mr Heng in an essay posted on Facebook. Mr Heng was Mr Lee’s Principal Private Secretary from 1997 to 2000.

Mr Heng’s account of Mr Lee's red box is as follows:

Mr Lee Kuan Yew had a red box. When I worked as Mr Lee’s Principal Private Secretary, or PPS, a good part of my daily life revolved around the red box. Before Mr Lee came in to work each day, the locked red box would arrive first, at about 9 am.

As far as the various officers who have worked with Mr Lee can remember, he had it for many, many years. It is a large, boxy briefcase, about fourteen centimetres wide. Red boxes came from the British government, whose Ministers used them for transporting documents between government offices. Our early Ministers had red boxes, but Mr Lee is the only one I know who used his consistently through the years. When I started working for Mr Lee in 1997, it was the first time I saw a red box in use. It is called the red box but is more a deep wine colour, like the seats in the chamber in Parliament House.

This red box held what Mr Lee was working on at any one time. Through the years, it held his papers, speech drafts, letters, readings, and a whole range of questions, reflections, and observations. For example, in the years that Mr Lee was working on his memoirs, the red box carried the multiple early drafts back and forth between his home and the office, scribbled over with his and Mrs Lee’s notes.

For a long time, other regular items in Mr Lee’s red box were the cassette tapes that held his dictated instructions and thoughts for later transcription. Some years back, he changed to using a digital recorder.

The red box carried a wide range of items. It could be communications with foreign leaders, observations about the financial crisis, instructions for the Istana grounds staff, or even questions about some trees he had seen on the expressway. Mr Lee was well-known for keeping extremely alert to everything he saw and heard around him – when he noticed something wrong, like an ailing raintree, a note in the red box would follow.

We could never anticipate what Mr Lee would raise – it could be anything that was happening in Singapore or the world. But we could be sure of this: it would always be about how events could affect Singapore and Singaporeans, and how we had to stay a step ahead. Inside the red box was always something about how we could create a better life for all.

We would get to work right away. Mr Lee’s secretaries would transcribe his dictated notes, while I followed up on instructions that required coordination across multiple government agencies. Our aim was to do as much as we could by the time Mr Lee came into the office later.

While we did this, Mr Lee would be working from home. For example, during the time that I worked with him (1997-2000), the Asian Financial Crisis ravaged many economies in our region and unleashed political changes. It was a tense period as no one could tell how events would unfold. Often, I would get a call from him to check certain facts or arrange meetings with financial experts.

In the years that I worked for him, Mr Lee’s daily breakfast was a bowl of dou hua (soft bean curd), with no syrup. It was picked up and brought home in a tiffin carrier every morning, from a food centre near Mr Lee’s home. He washed it down with room-temperature water. Mr Lee did not take coffee or tea at breakfast.

When Mr Lee came into the office, the work that had come earlier in the red box would be ready for his review, and he would have a further set of instructions for our action.

From that point on, the work day would run its normal course. Mr Lee read the documents and papers, cleared his emails, and received official calls by visitors. I was privileged to sit in for every meeting he conducted. He would later ask me what I thought of the meetings – it made me very attentive to every word that was said, and I learnt much from Mr Lee.

Evening was Mr Lee’s exercise time. Mr Lee has described his extensive and disciplined exercise regime elsewhere. It included the treadmill, rowing, swimming and walking – with his ears peeled to the evening news or his Mandarin practice tapes. He would sometimes take phone calls while exercising.

He was in his 70s then. In more recent years, being less stable on his feet, Mr Lee had a simpler exercise regime. But he continued to exercise. Since retiring from the Minister Mentor position in 2011, Mr Lee was more relaxed during his exercises. Instead of listening intently to the news or taking phone calls, he shared his personal stories and joked with his staff.

While Mr Lee exercised, those of us in the office would use that time to focus once again on the red box, to get ready all the day’s work for Mr Lee to take home with him in the evening. Based on the day’s events and instructions, I tried to get ready the materials that Mr Lee might need. It sometimes took longer than I expected, and occasionally, I had to ask the security officer to come back for the red box later.

While Mrs Lee was still alive, she used to drop by the Istana at the end of the day, in order to catch a few minutes together with Mr Lee, just to sit and look at the Istana trees that they both loved. They chatted about what many other old couples would talk about. They discussed what they should have for dinner, or how their grandchildren were doing.

Then back home went Mr Lee, Mrs Lee and the red box. After dinner, Mr and Mrs Lee liked to take a long stroll. In his days as Prime Minister, while Mrs Lee strolled, Mr Lee liked to ride a bicycle. It was, in the words of those who saw it, “one of those old man bicycles”. None of us who have worked at the Istana can remember him ever changing his bicycle. He did not use it in his later years, as he became frail, but I believe the “old man bicycle” is still around somewhere.

After his dinner and evening stroll, Mr Lee would get back to his work. That was when he opened the red box and worked his way through what we had put into it in the office.

Mr Lee’s study is converted out of his son’s old bedroom. His work table is a simple, old wooden table with a piece of clear glass placed over it. Slipped under the glass are family memorabilia, including a picture of our current PM from his National Service days. When Mrs Lee was around, she stayed up reading while Mr Lee worked. They liked to put on classical music while they stayed up.

In his days as PM, Mr Lee’s average bedtime was three-thirty in the morning. As Senior Minister and Minister Mentor, he went to sleep after two in the morning. If he had to travel for an official visit the next day, he might go to bed at one or two in the morning.
Deep into the night, while the rest of Singapore slept, it was common for Mr Lee to be in full work mode.

Before he went to bed, Mr Lee would put everything he had completed back in the red box, with clear pointers on what he wished for us to do in the office. The last thing he did each day was to place the red box outside his study room. The next morning, the duty security team picked up the red box, brought it to us waiting in the office, and a new day would begin.

Let me share two other stories involving the red box.

In 1996, Mr Lee underwent balloon angioplasty to insert a stent. It was his second heart operation in two months, after an earlier operation to widen a coronary artery did not work. After the operation, he was put in the Intensive Care Unit for observation. When he regained consciousness and could sit up in bed, he asked for his security team. The security officer hurried into the room to find out what was needed. Mr Lee asked, “Can you pass me the red box?”

Even at that point, Mr Lee’s first thought was to continue working. The security officer rushed the red box in, and Mr Lee asked to be left to his work. The nurses told the security team that other patients of his age, in Mr Lee’s condition, would just rest. Mr Lee was 72 at the time.

In 2010, Mr Lee was hospitalised again, this time for a chest infection. While he was in the hospital, Mrs Lee passed away. Mr Lee has spoken about his grief at Mrs Lee’s passing. As soon as he could, he left the hospital to attend the wake at Sri Temasek.
At the end of the night, he was under doctor’s orders to return to the hospital. But he asked his security team if they could take him to the Singapore River instead. It was late in the night, and Mr Lee was in mourning. His security team hastened to give a bereaved husband a quiet moment to himself.

As Mr Lee walked slowly along the bank of the Singapore River, the way he and Mrs Lee sometimes did when she was still alive, he paused. He beckoned a security officer over. Then he pointed out some trash floating on the river, and asked, “Can you take a photo of that? I’ll tell my PPS what to do about it tomorrow.” Photo taken, he returned to the hospital.

I was no longer Mr Lee’s PPS at the time. I had moved on to the Monetary Authority of Singapore, to continue with the work to strengthen our financial regulatory system that Mr Lee had started in the late 1990s. But I can guess that Mr Lee probably had some feedback on keeping the Singapore River clean. I can also guess that the picture and the instructions were ferried in Mr Lee’s red box the next morning to the office. Even as Mr Lee lay in the hospital. Even as Mrs Lee lay in state.

The security officers with Mr Lee were deeply touched. When I heard about these moments, I was also moved.

I have taken some time to describe Mr Lee’s red box. The reason is that, for me, it symbolises Mr Lee’s unwavering dedication to Singapore so well. The diverse contents it held tell us much about the breadth of Mr Lee’s concerns – from the very big to the very small; the daily routine of the red box tells us how Mr Lee’s life revolved around making Singapore better, in ways big and small.

By the time I served Mr Lee, he was the Senior Minister. Yet he continued to devote all his time to thinking about the future of Singapore. I could only imagine what he was like as Prime Minister. In policy and strategy terms, he was always driving himself, me, and all our colleagues to think about what each trend and development meant for Singapore, and how we should respond to it in order to secure Singapore’s wellbeing and success.

As his PPS, I saw the punishing pace of work that Mr Lee set himself. I had a boss whose every thought and every action was for Singapore.

But it takes private moments like these to bring home just how entirely Mr Lee devoted his life to Singapore.

In fact, I think the best description comes from the security officer who was with Mr Lee both of those times. He was on Mr Lee’s team for almost 30 years. He said of Mr Lee: “Mr Lee is always country, country, country. And country.”

This year, Singapore turns 50. Mr Lee would have turned 92 this September. Mr Lee entered the hospital on 5 February 2015. He continued to use his red box every day until 4 February 2015.

31 things to say for a month - Day 28: Our Founding Father

Day 28: Our founding father - Mr. Lee Kuan Yew 

This is one post which I have shortlisted in my 31 things to say for a month since two years ago but never got down to writing it. I wanted to write it after I am done with reading his memoirs. Today, I finally finished the first of his memoirs - the Singapore story. I have been reading his memoirs for the past 2 months every night before bedtime and not too long after, he was hospitalised on 5 Feb due to pneumonia. The last time I blog about one of our founding fathers, Dr. Goh Keng Swee, it was after I read the book, "Men in White" and come to realise his contributions to our economy. 5 years later, I am writing about another of our founding fathers in Singapore.

There are a few parts of his memoirs that left me a deep impression and I shall talk about them as a tribute to this man who deserves the respect of ALL Singaporeans, PAST and PRESENT!

First, it is about the one whereby he visited the constituencies after his team and him decided to have a clean break with the communists in the PAP. They knew that they had to build up their own strong electorate and fight the communists face to face in order to realise their aspirations to help Singapore break free from colonialism. The visits were not restricted to his own constituency of Tanjong Pagar but all over Singapore. He went around in a Land Rover and he mentioned how his hands were so sore and swollen by all the hand shaking and his back knocked against the steel body of his open-top Land Rover, resulting in multiple bruises at his back. However, he persevered and thought of ways to overcome such issues because he knew that if he wanted to build a nation, he has to know the needs of the people and help them fulfill them.

Second, it is about his wittiness. He experienced Japanese occupation first hand and during this period of time, he was also creative and bold to help his family tide over their multiple problems. If you had known him at that time, you will know that this boy was meant to be someone great in the future.

Third, it is about how we learnt the various languages just so he could not communicate and rally the people. He was educated in English and spoke Malay to his grandma who is of Java descent. However, he knew he had to picked up Chinese if he wanted to connect with the bulk of the Chinese immigrants then. I am a Hokkien and I know how difficult it is to learn Hokkien because you cannot translate the words from Chinese directly, unlike Cantonese. However, Mr. Lee did and eventually was able to conduct his rally in Hokkien in order to fight the communists. Hokkien is really a language that can sound so uncouth yet has this effect of rallying people together for a common cause. Whenever I hear people complaining about how LHL was groomed to become LKY's successor and Singapore belongs to the Lee Family, I would want to challenge the person. When you were ten, what were you doing? You were probably playing marbles or hopscotch with your friends or Candy Crush for the kids these days or some other IT gadget. You may complain about PSLE blah blah blah but do you have any idea that at the age of 10, LHL had already learnt Javanese and was busy translating Utusan Melayu newspapers for his father. He knew as a kid how Singapore was constantly under the threat of our neighbours and because of this, he is more determined than anyone else to help continue his father's legacy and also Singapore's prosperity and peace.

Fourth, it is about how he went about running the nation. Many people might say that he is too undemocratic, disguising his communist ideals with a democratic front. However, I love this quote that he said:

I am no longer in active politics. It is irrelevant what young Singaporeans think of me. What they think of me after I'm dead and gone in one generation will be determined by researchers who do PhDs on me.
I did what I thought was right, given the circumstances, given by my knowledge at the time, given the pressures on me at the time. That's finished, done. I move forward. You keep on harking back, it's just wasting time.
I have no regrets. I have spent my life, so much of it, building up this country. That's nothing more that I need to do. At the end of the day, what have I gotten? A successful Singapore. What have I given up? My life. 

Honestly, given the circumstances that Singapore faced, we could possibly end up as the next Cuba. Besides, I do not think that he had been autocratic in the wrong way. The things that he insisted on were for the good for Singapore such as using English as the medium of instruction in schools, bilingual policy, nationalising public transport, public utilities, imposing National Service, etc. No doubt he banned the use of dialects in public broadcasting and made some of us lose our roots but I strongly agree with his rationale. Our roots are no longer in China and where we come from, we should see ourselves as a country in Southeast Asia - calling ourselves Singaporeans. Our heritage will be that of Malay, Chinese, English, Tamil - a blend of races in the country!

Yes our investment in Suzhou Industrial Park did not reap the desired returns but sometimes we cannot be too short-sighted. Investment is not only about the dollars and cents but also the networks that we built in the process and making ourselves known to the world.

You might hate CPF because you cannot spend your hard-earned money when you retire. However, I am all in for CPF. Imagine what would happen if the elderly did not have retirement savings. You have to pay higher taxes to support them, would you want to do that? CPF is just about not being able to use your hard-earned money when you are old but when you die, at least your children can benefit from your bequest. It is just insurance of another form. Imagine if there is no CPF, you cannot even spend your money when you are young because the government will have to tax your income even more.

You might say National Education is propaganda but what it promotes is the love for a country. It just so happens that our country is built by the PAP. Winners always have the right to write history. If Hitler had successfully dominated Europe through nuclear weapons, do you think you will have the chance to criticise him today?

I have seen so many Facebook posts paying tribute to Mr. LKY but this sums up my emotions in the most Singaporean way possible:

Ok... i read that former prime minister lee kuan yew... is critically ill... and we all know whats gonna come after that....
I am honestly gonna be very sad when he is no longer ard. He had a full life and at 91.... thats consoling to the mind....
I see alot of ppl saying... if the old man dies... i will be damn happy.... But i jus want to ask.... what r we angry at?? Coz he took a small shitty island and turned it into what it is today??
Coz today... our currency is almost on par with USA... 1.36 exchange rate... BY THE WAY... and that country is a giant... the world's superpower la.... and we are almost on par... our neighbour's exchange with us is at 2.4 smthg.... dun know... dun care
Today... companies all over the world come here to start their regional hq... coz of the stable platform created....
Today... india.... a country with the world's second largest population... has HIRED SINGAPORE'S EXPERTISE TO BUILD A NEW CAPITAL CITY FOR ITSELF!!!
sure... cars are expensive....here la... do u know in thailand... or jakarta... a small distance like yishun to ang mo kio... will take 2 hours... to drive... because everyone has a car and its congested very badly....this was said to me by a thai tourist and a indonesian tourist.....
Sure... houses are expensive... do u know that in hongkong... ppl dun own their flats??? Its so expensive... everyone rents!!! And the houses are smaller than our flats....
Everyday since i was born... till today.... i cannot remember a day when electricity or water went out.... i can drink the water out of the tap and toilet bowl... its that clean.... and i can switch on my fan anytime i want... it will work.... i went to india and i witnessed it first hand.... bloody every three hours... there was a power cut.... even in hotels... then the generators will kick in...
New delhi... a girl was raped and violently abused.... brought to SINGAPORE for treatment... we all remember that... dun we...
Superstar rajnikanth.... calls Lee Kuan Yew a hero... CAME TO SINGAPORE FOR TREATMENT....
sure we buy water from our neighbour... but how many of us know that we treat the same water and sell it back to our neighbour???
I had a tourist from paris... she told me that she lost her husband to a heart attack... they live in the outskirts of paris... she called for an ambulance... it took the damn ambulance 2 hours to get to them.... PARIS OK!!!! city of love... world reknowned tourist spot... 2 hours for ambulance response....
You dial 995 and call for ambulance now la.. you see how long the response time is...
God damn they even opened up independent ambulance companies so that the real emergencies can be attended to by SCDF laaa
Sure.. there was a riot in little india... but it was contained wasnt it??? Ya our police and civil defence got a beating... but still... did any civilian get injured??? Ppl living in the flats beside... got injured??? The ambulance that got burnt.... what does it show... singapore's patience or that particular nationality's uncivilised behaviour....
The very next day.... that road was cleaned and relaid....
Even in war laa.... its protocol to nvr hit safety vehicles.... what the hell....
I met a tourist from sweden... and she said... she got raped whilst going for a jog from her house to her neighbour's house which was 2 miles away.... there was nobody to help her.... and thats y she moved to singapore...
My current job allows me to meet different nationalities everyday... straight from the airport.... and we always get to talking... abt their country versus mine... and almost EVERY SINGLE person.... tells me
"You guys dun know how good u have it here"
Every government has its flaws and shortcomings..... every government.... they r humans laaa.... not machines.....
Our laws are amongst the strictest.... and i have personally felt the brunt of some of the laws... but u know what??? I aint complaining.... my mum.. sister... girlfren... can go out and come back whatever time... they r fine...
I can sleep in my van and wake up... with my doors unlocked... i will not be mugged and robbed
Ppl from certain countries come here... to study... they have to take cross over exams... to match our system
I go somewhere.... my education is recognised la god damn it
Foreigner influx was probably the blooper singapore did.... but hey.... i have got a job... i earn very well... i am happy...
I have got close friends that live in condos.. drive nice cars... live in landed houses... have lots of money.....
So its definitely possible for everyone to "live the life" here... sure it may be difficult to rise up to the top... but hey.... other countries easy ahhhh????? You know ahhh????
A flat in singapore is 300,000.... a landed house in the states is also 300,000.... u get alot of space... but u still NEED TO HAVE MONEY.....
Soooo.... if u r not successful.. blame urself.... not the country.. the system... the lamp post... or the dog....
U never study... ur fault... u nvr work hard... ur fault...
Other countries... got natural resources... to build on... what does singapore have??? NOTHING!!! the people are the resource... and that why we have to work and contribute to build the country...
America... canada... all 40% tax sia... and here we complain for paying CPF and tax....
U try la... go and say smthg bad abt our neighbour to their citizens... or better still say smthg bad abt india to an indian citizen who lives in singapore.... you see what happens....
Their country is full of injustice and problems.... but they will NEVER SPEAK DOWN ON THEIR COUNTRY...
Look at what we r doing.....
This social portal page... newnation or smthg... teases that singapore will be renamed Lee Kuan Yew... eh why laaa i ask u. Then name as what??
mohd goahead bin gostan???
Or
Angamuthu s/o singamuthu
Is it???
That man.... whether u like it or not... was a key installation to the life we have today..... not sang nila utama... or that tengku.... or stamford raffles.....
The name is LEE KUAN YEW...
and if he is no longer ard.... i WILL feel sad.... coz god damn it i am SINGAPOREAN... and even though my country has its fair share of bullshit.... i LOVE this damn place.... the life and opportunity it has given me.... the level playing field it has given me....
And it was because Lee Kuan Yew had a vision and he went abt executing it....
Lets show a little bit of gratfulness laaa... a little bit....
Whether he did right or wrong.....the man who gave us this quality of life has reached the end of the tunnel.... let him go in peace and respect.....

Source: Ganesh Sundram 

For me, I have only RESPECT for Mr. Lee Kuan Yew and nothing else. No hatred or displeasure of any sorts. He implemented the institutions that ensured that people are given equal opportunities to succeed in life, not just equal outcomes. Although I voice out my displeasure with the education system from time to time about how it takes away the love for learning, I guess this is the best solution Mr. Lee and his team had at that point in time when the nation was being built. I myself have tremendously benefitted from meritocracy. If you work hard in Singapore, you will not be left behind. 

Meritocracy breeds elitism, no doubt. Those who are well endowed (rich) will be better off because they have more resources to begin but would the outcomes be different without meritocracy? I doubt so. The rich will always get richer even in a communist regime and China and Russia speak of that. 

It is easy for us to voice our displeasure with the many things in Singapore but at the end of the day, if you do not have a better solution to the problems, then you just have to accept things as they are. I am pretty sure that although a lot of Singaporeans complain about our government, at the end of the day, we just want an avenue to rant. We still love Singapore and Mr. Lee who gave us this place to call home. 

Many years ago, I contemplated emigrating. However, as I age, my love for the nation grows. I still want to be a global citizen that travels around the world to experiment with and experience life. However, when I eventually age, I will bring with me my wealth of experience and contribute to my country in my own little way. 

There is still so much more for me to write about but this is getting way too long. I shall sign off. 

有国才有家, 谢谢您，李先生，给了我们一个家。